Monday, September 29, 2014

A Review on A.W. Tozer's, "And He Dwelt Among Us."



Author: A.W. Tozer 
Editor: James L. Snider 
Publisher: Regal 
224 pages

INTRODUCTION
            The twentieth century pastor and author, A.W. Tozer, is known for being one of the greatest Christian authors of his time. It would be accurate to say that he had a heart of pastor and a voice of a prophet. Being an author of many books, he proved to be an effective and extraordinary writer. For this critique, his thirteen-chapter work, And He Dwelt Among Us: Teachings from the Gospel of John, will be both summarized and analyzed for a further understanding.

                                                                     SUMMARY
            Starting his work with John 1:1, Tozer speaks about Christ being since the beginning and Christ did indeed come to dwell among those in the world. With this, he speaks heavily on how the heart of mankind longs after everlastingness. Regardless of their sin nature, they seek an everlasting even if they do not fully grasp what it is they are longing for. Along with man seeking for everlastingness, the everlastingness of Christ is greatly expounded on. Speaking the time before time ever began, the nature of the Lord is enunciated. Tozer shares how God is self-sufficient, self-existent, and how all things were created by Him and for Him. God does need mankind in order to make Him God. He merely made mankind out of his goodness and grace.
            Although God is a God who does not need mankind to make Him who He is, Tozer speaks on John 1:10 of Christ coming into the world. Here, the author speaks on a twofold understanding of the world. The world is the created nature, which includes the plant life, animal life, universe, etc. The second meaning of world is mankind. This was the world that rejected Christ. It was mankind that rejected him as demonstrated in 1:10, not the nature. With mankind rejecting him, there are five reasons behind why they did so: they could not keep from compromising with the world, they could not change their way of living, they did not want to cleanse their lives, they could not change the direction of their life, and they did not want to step out of their comfort zone where they could not see.
            Although humanity rejected Christ, God the Father still used him as a channel for His grace. Whether one is a committed follower of Christ or not, the blessings of God are poured out among all men through Christ. Both the saving grace and common grace of God is poured through Christ. Yet this channel—Jesus Christ—is the promised Messiah that is found in the Old Testament. Tozer speaks that Christ is the Lamb of God that was promised by John the Baptist and the one promised throughout the Old Testament.
            In spite of humanity’s sin, God cares for all people. Although he does not care their sin, he cares for them as individuals and their souls. Speaking on John 3:16, Tozer speaks on the goodness, love, and mercy of God. How Christ, the atonement of mankind, was given that they may be reunited with their heavenly Father. Following this verse, Tozer emphasizes how Christ was sent in order to condemned the world but to save it. Speaking on the election of some to heaven and some to hell, the author is eager to speak on how God does not elect any to hell but desires all to come to repentance.
            Along with Christ being the atonement for all men, Tozer speaks on the Godhead. Although the Trinity is something that is questioned or denied, it is certainly found in the Scripture. One is not more superior to the other because they are all God. Being a part of the Godhead, Jesus is the great judge. However, in order to be a judge of humanity, there are requirements that are to be met. Jesus, of course, meets these requirements because He is indeed Lord. Although in the flesh as a man, Christ was fully man and demonstrated the God-man when he stepped on earth. This was how God reached to man—Jesus Christ. This was how God chose to come to man and to demonstrate His love for them, through Christ.
            Christ, being the God-man, he brings about transformation in the believer’s life. Tozer speaks on how a mere belief is not enough when it comes to Christ. The demons even believe in Christ, yet they are not saved. If one is truly repentant and have submitted to Christ, their beliefs will change them. It is not a matter of a belief, but the belief in them that brings a transforming work. It is only through a proper concept of God that one can have true conversion. Without it, one cannot have genuine relationship and be saved.

                                                                    ANALYSIS
            Although a brief summary has been given on Tozer’s work, an examination of the text will be given in order to have a greater understanding from a reader’s perspective. Some of the things that will be included in the analysis are the strengths and weaknesses, the appropriate audience for the composition, the assistance that the writing gives to an individual to help understand the issues it presents, what this reader appreciates from it, the issues that are found within the text, what the author’s perspective is, how readable and applicable the composition is, and what should be added or taken away from the work.

Strengths
            There are many strengths found in Tozer’s composition, more so than weaknesses. First, the work is written in such fashion that a layperson or unbeliever could read from it. Tozer does not use words that the average person cannot understand. He writes on a level that any individual would write, although it is not written as though a pastor or scholar could not learn from it. One would assume that because the author wrote in the early to mid 1900s that the writing would be a hard to understand. However, Tozer does exceedingly well to keep the composition user friendly so essentially anyone, from young teenager to an elderly adult, a background in Christianity or another world religion, can pick it up and read it and have a great understanding.
            Along with the writing being easy for essentially any individual to read, Tozer writes as if someone who is a not a Christian or is a false professing Christian, they can have assurance on how to inherit salvation. Throughout his writing can be found how one can come under the lordship of Christ, through repentance and faith. An example is found at the end of the chapters where he says, “Look back and see the burden Jesus bore, lay your hand of faith on His holy head and confess your sins, and the curse will be removed…”[1] Tozer is certain to make sure the gospel is presented in order for those who may be not be converted may hear the hope that is found in Jesus Christ.
            A third strength found in the work of Tozer is the beginning of each chapter has not only an informative title but also a verse or passage to complement it. The verse or passage that greets the audience coincides with the title of the chapter. Moreover, the verse and or passage is expounded on throughout the chapter to give the one who is reading it a greater understanding. An example includes chapter eight, where Tozer uses John 3:17, “For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” Through the chapter, the author explains verse in a threefold manner: “God sent His Son into the world,” “He did not send Him to condemn the world,” “He sent Him in order that the world might be saved.”[2] Throughout all thirteen chapters of the writing Tozer is certain to properly and concisely explain the verses he builds the chapters around.
            A long with the great use of scripture and the proclamation of the gospel throughout, the author does a great work not “running down rabbit trails.” Other words, Tozer does not talk about a certain topic and then throw another idea that has nothing to do with the topic he first presented. Throughout his entire work he carefully explains and uses analogies to go with the topics that he presents. He is careful to keep with the topic and the properly present so the audience does not leave the chapter confused or baffled by his carelessness.
            A final strength of composition is the source of the writing. Not only is it written based of the Gospel of John, but it was written by a man who was a longtime pastor. Although this is not the greatest of attributes of the writing, his background in both the pastorate and being a Christian author makes the writing one that is biblically based. It is this strength that allows any person to pick up and open its covers with confidence. Carefully written and presented, the pastor-author background gives one assurance that the source of the writing is one that is shows legitimacy.

Weaknesses
            As formerly mentioned, there are more strengths in Tozer’s work than there are weaknesses. However, with every work from any author, there always seems to be weakness. As for Tozer’s work, the following weaknesses given are not detrimental to his work. They do not take away from the meaning of the work nor disprove anything that he asserts.
            One of the weaknesses that are found in his work are the hymns or poems he includes to elaborate on a particular issue. What he uses are snippets of older writings dated from the 1700-1800s. An example of this is from John Milton’s poem, On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity.[3] Although any Christian can enjoy this God-honoring poem, it can be difficult for individuals of modern times to understand some of the older terms used or even find it appealing. However, this is certainly not an issue of Tozer, since his composition was completed back in 1900s. It makes sense why he would have used the selected snippets that he gives. It can be a turn off to those who are not interested in reading older poetry or hymn, but it certainly does not take away from what he writes.
            A final weakness, which does not take away from the book, is the several personal experiences he uses to prove an assertion. An example of this is his story about the usage of John 3:16.[4] Some may take some of these personal experiences as the author being self-centered or too good to use examples of others. With the life of Tozer, it is highly improbable that he sought to elevate himself or sought to say, “Look at me!” Some would rather hear someone speak of him or herself in a negative light or use others as examples.

Suited Audience
            With both strengths and weaknesses formerly given, it helps establish an idea of who the text is and is not suited for. First, the audience that is best suited for this is both the Christian and non-Christian. For the former because it gives the believer a deeper understanding of the text with precise exposition, while for the latter it is written in a way that is simplistic, along with being gospel-centered and having parts that explains how one can become born again.
            Although both the saved and unsaved are suited for this writing, the ages from teenage to the elderly are able to understand it. It is written simple enough that is easy for someone of those ages to read. Although it is easy enough for those sorts of ages to read, it is not proper for anyone younger than a teenager to read, as it is both a lengthy text and places much information in a single chapter. With that in mind, any one from the ages of teen to elderly, rather saved or unsaved, is the suited audience for Tozer’s work. It is an overall excellent work and is certainly fruitful in learning about the One who dwelt among us—Jesus Christ.




[1] Ibid., 169. 
[2] Ibid., 123-137.
[3] Ibid., 63-64.    
[4] Ibid., 107.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Discipleship Series, Salvation Pt 1: 5 Worldviews of Salvation


FIVE VIEWS OF SALVATION

1.     Pluralism: Many are the roads to the One
a.     Many roads lead to God.
b.     No religion can claim to be the exclusive way or a superior way to God.
c.     This view has strong appeal due to the emphasis upon the cardinal cultural virtues of acceptance, tolerance, and non-judgmental.

                                               i.     Five Arguments for this view:
1.     Exclusive way to promote tolerance in an oppressive world.
2.      What others adhere to in their worldview is livable for them.
3.     Historically, world religions develop geographically. Thus, “How can Christianity claim to be the ‘best’ or ‘only’ way?
4.     Exclusive religions, such as Christianity, fail to produce ethically superior adherents.
5.     Popular pluralism views assume that all religions teach the same basic truth.

                                             ii.     Problem:
1.     They necessitate the abandonment of distinctive truths claims regarding the Trinity, the incarnation of Christ, the atonement, and the resurrection. They do not, however, single out Buddhism, which rejects some of the literature of Hinduism.
2.     They avoid the issue of truth. World religions give contradictory solutions to basic questions. Therefore, it is incorrect that all religions teach the same basic truth. (ex:
a.     God is personal (Christianity; Judaism) vs. God is impersonal (Vedantic Hinduism)
b.     There is one God (Christianity; Judaism; Islam) vs. Many gods (Shintoism; Mormonism) vs. No God (Theravadic Buddhism) 
c.     Humans are guilty of rebellion against a holy God (Christianity) vs. Humanity’s problem is ignorance (Hinduism) vs. suffering (Buddhism)
d.     Salvation is the transformation of the individuals (Christianity) vs. Salvation released from the cycle of rebirths (Hinduism; Buddhism)
3.     Adhering to the god Moloch. One is to sacrifice children.
4.     A proper method of evaluation of the ethical system should occur rather than the individual believer (ex:
a.     Buddhism claims to be a compassionate religion, yet says an individual may suffer because of bad karma in their past life.

2.     Universalism: All things reconciled to God
a.     All human beings are reconciled to God.
b.     No person will be eternally punished or separated from God.
c.     They do not base their position on Scripture but appeal to ethical and theological principles for support—namely, the injustice of an eternal hell and the eternal love of God.

                                               i.     Problem: This view takes away the freedom of man. God denies human freedom.

3.     Inclusivism: Salvation by general revelation
a.     Agrees that Jesus is the only Savior but believes in the possibility that some people can receive salvation without an explicit knowledge of Jesus.
b.     “God’s forgiveness and acceptance of humanity have been made possible by his death, but the benefits of this sacrifice are not confined to those who respond to it with an explicit act of faith.”
c.     Insist that devout believers of other religions will be saved, but only on the basis of Christ’s atoning work.

                                               i.     Problem
1.     Scripture indicates one must believe in Christ in order to be saved: “And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house” (Acts 16:31).
2.     Scripture also indicates one must repent of their sin to be saved: “And saying, ‘The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel’” (Mark 1:15).


4.     Postmodern Opportunity: Getting it right the second time
a.     People receive an after-death opportunity to develop faith in Christ.
b.     An individual who has heard the gospel message in this present age, this postmodern occasion functions as a second chance for salvation.
c.     An individual who never heard the gospel message in this present age, this postmodern opportunity functions as the first chance for salvation.
d.     One advocate of this view says that hell is as a hospital for sick souls who can receive a cure if one receives the medicine.

5.     Restrictivist: Salvation in the name of Jesus only
a.     Jesus is the Savior of only those who have explicit faith in Him.
b.     Another name for this view is exclusivism
c.     Throughout the New Testament, faith is stated as a prerequisite for salvation.
d.     Romans 10:13 says, “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the LORD shall be saved.”


Thursday, December 27, 2012

The Queen James Bible (The Gay Bible)



Today, the homosexual community is crying out for acceptance in our society. The community accuses the Body of Christ, in particular, of practicing bigotry, stating that Jesus Christ loves all people and does not frown upon nor condemn another for seeking to have relations with the same sex. In order to show their case as factual, they leave out the passages that condemn homosexuality, and say such things as, “Jesus loves.” However, that was just the beginning of the twisting of the sacred Scripture.

Recently, there was an altered version of the 1769 King James that was released. This altered version, the Queen James Bible (Gay Bible), has changed eight verses (Gen. 19:5; Lev. 18:22; 20:13; Rom. 1:26; 27; 1 Cor. 6:9; 1 Tim. 1:10; Jude 1:7). Of course, the text that was altered, removed, or replaced is done so to take out any form of homosexuality found within the passages of Scripture. The editors of the Queen James Bible say the following in regards to the alterations:
Most English Bible translations that actively condemn homosexuality have based themselves on the King James Version and have erroneously adapted its words to support their own agenda. We wanted to return to the clean source and start there. 
The Bible is the word of God translated by man. This (saying nothing countless translations and the evolution of language itself) means the Bible can be interpreted in different ways, leading to what we call “interpretive ambiguity.” In editing The Queen James Bible we were faced with the decision to modify existing interpretively ambiguous language, or simply to delete it.[1] 
Matt Slick, from CARM.org, states the following about the Queen James Bible:

I'm glad they acknowledge that most translations condemn homosexuality.  But, the anonymous editors of the QJV changed the translations, reinterpreted them, and made them say the opposite of what the original languages state. It says on page one of the QJV:  "The Queen James Bible is based on The King James Bible, edited to prevent homophobic misinterpretation."  Edit they did; translate they did not.[2]

The words of Mr. Slick, “Edit they did; translated they did not,” ring true. There was no proper translation of the biblical languages from the editors of this altered text, but simply an alteration to fit their depraved desires. The editor’s assertion of seeking to return to the “clean” source is nothing more than a lie, seeking to cause both those within the Body of Christ and the unbeliever to believe that the manuscripts actually did not condemn homosexuality.

The following are some facts about both the Old and the New Testament manuscripts.

THE OLD TESTAMENT

Up until 1947, the oldest manuscripts we had of the Old Testament text dated to A.D. 900. However, in 1947, the Dead Sea Scroll manuscripts, which date back 1,000 years earlier than those manuscripts to 150 B.C., were discovered. The discovery of this text in Qumran demonstrates the accuracy of the text the Church had used throughout its history. What is astonishing is that the variation between the two texts was a mere five percent, and this variation does not compromise any sort of doctrine taught from the Old Testament text. They are simply variations in spelling. These manuscripts are dated 1,000 years apart, and there are no major alterations. 

 THE NEW TESTAMENT
 
The number of manuscripts for the New Testament is more than 24,000, both partial and complete. Moreover, there are 86,000 quotations of the New Testament text found within the Early Church Father’s writings and in thousands of lectionaries. Within the 24,000 manuscripts, there are over 150,000 variants. That seems to be a huge number! However, most of these variations, 99% to be exact, are of no significance. These variants include misspellings or the order of words being reversed. Of the remaining 1% (50 variants), doctrine and any moral commandment remain unaffected.[3]

Comparison of the New Testament text to other ancient text[4]:

Ancient Author
Date Written
Earliest Copy
Number of Copies
Accuracy of Copies
Caesar
1st cent. B.C.
A.D. 900
10
- -
Livy
1st cent. B.C.
- -
20
- -
Tacitus
c. A.D. 100
A.D. 1100
20
- -
Thucydides
5th cent. B.C.
A.D. 900
8
- -
Herodotus
5th cent. B.C.
A.D. 900
8
- -
Demosthenes
4th cent. B.C.
A.D. 1100
200
- -
Mahabharata
- -
- -
- -
90%
Homer
9th cent. B.C.
- -
643
95%
New Testament
1st cent. A.D. (A.D. 50-100)
2nd cent. A.D. (c. A.D. 130)
5,000
99+%


As shown in the above chart, the New Testament text is superior to other ancient texts. Compared to other ancient texts, the New Testament is the most reliable with its accuracy and multitude of manuscripts.

If the biblical manuscripts were altered and in need of being corrected, as the editors of the Queen James Bible say, then they must disprove the absolute accuracy of the text that is listed above. Because God is not the author of confusion but the author of the Scriptures, we can rely on modern translations, such as the King James Bible, and see that the Queen James Bible is nothing more than a perversion of God’s truth.

For a greater understanding of the Queen James Bible and its fallacies, please read Matt Slick’s article found on the CARM website: http://carm.org/queen-james-bible.






[1] “Editor's Notes,” The Queen James Bible, http://queenjamesbible.com/gay-bible/ (accessed December 27, 2012).

[2] “The Queen James Bible, the Gay Bible,” CARM, http://carm.org/queen-james-bible (accessed December 27, 2012).

[3] Ron Rhodes & Marian Bodine, Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Mormons (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 1995), 165.

[4] Ibid., 167